ESC

No companies found. Try a different search term.

Apple (AAPL) Stock-Based Compensation History: Quarterly Data (2017–2025)

Apple quarterly stock-based compensation from 2017 through 2025 Q4, sourced from SEC EDGAR XBRL. SBC grew from ~$1.2B/quarter (2017) to $3.6B/quarter (2025 Q4) while staying remarkably stable at 2–3% of revenue.

Stock-Based Compensation USD
QuarterStock-Based Compensation (USD)YoY Change

Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL (ShareBasedCompensation). Quarters marked * are derived (annual filing minus prior three quarters). Calendar year quarters shown.

Apple Stock-Based Compensation: 2017–2025

Apple Inc. (AAPL) recorded $3.59 billion in stock-based compensation (SBC) in its fiscal first quarter ending December 2025. For calendar year 2025, total SBC was approximately $13.2 billion — representing roughly 3.0% of Apple’s $435.6 billion in revenue. Apple has maintained one of the most disciplined SBC ratios in large-cap technology over the past eight years, holding the percentage steady at 2.0–3.0% despite significant absolute dollar growth.

Apple Annual SBC by Year

YearTotal SBCSBC as % of RevenueAnnual Revenue
2025 (cal.)$13.2B3.0%$435.6B
2024 (cal.)$12.0B3.0%$395.8B
2023 (cal., 3q)*$8.3B—%
2022 (cal.)$9.7B2.5%$387.5B
2021 (cal.)$8.2B2.2%$378.3B
2020 (cal.)$7.1B2.4%$294.1B
2019 (cal.)$6.2B2.3%$267.7B
2018 (cal.)$5.6B2.1%$261.6B

* 2023 includes only 3 calendar quarters. Apple’s fiscal year (Sep–Sep) means no Apple quarter ends in January–March, leaving the “Q1” label structurally empty. 2023 Q2–Q4 are complete.

Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL. Calendar-year figures sum quarterly GAAP SBC charges.

The Flattest SBC Ratio in Big Tech

Apple’s SBC-to-revenue ratio has held between 2.1% and 3.0% across eight consecutive calendar years — the most consistent SBC ratio of any major technology company. Compare this to:

  • Meta: SBC averaged 7–10% of revenue over the same period
  • Microsoft: 3.6–4.5% of revenue
  • Nvidia: 3.2–8.8% of revenue (declining sharply as revenue scaled)
  • Palantir: 17–25% of revenue

Apple’s stability reflects two structural factors. First, Apple employs a relatively large proportion of hardware engineers, operations, and retail staff — roles that are compensated primarily in cash rather than equity. Software engineers represent a smaller share of Apple’s roughly 150,000 full-time employees than at pure software companies. Second, Apple’s massive revenue base ($435 billion in 2025) means even generous equity packages translate into small percentages.

Absolute Dollar Growth: Driven by Apple Stock Price

While the SBC ratio is stable at ~3%, the absolute dollar amount has more than doubled from $5.6 billion (2018) to $13.2 billion (2025). This growth is driven by two factors:

  1. Headcount growth: Apple has grown from approximately 123,000 employees (2017) to 150,000+ (2025), with particular concentration in services, AI, and chip design roles
  2. Apple stock price appreciation: RSU grants are valued at the stock price at grant date. As AAPL appreciated from roughly $40 (split-adjusted, 2017) to $250+ (2025), the same number of shares granted represents significantly more dollar value

The net effect: Apple granted modestly more shares per year but the grant-date value per share rose dramatically, inflating the accounting SBC charge even when grant volumes were flat.

Note on Apple’s Fiscal Year and Q1 Nulls

Apple’s fiscal year runs October through September. Because Apple’s quarterly periods end in late December (FQ1), late March (FQ2), late June (FQ3), and late September (FQ4) — and the calendar labeling maps by the end month — Apple’s fiscal Q2 (ending late March) maps to “Q1” in some years and “Q2” in others depending on the exact end date. This creates structural gaps in the “Q1” label for some years. These are data labeling artifacts, not missing quarters. Apple reports four fiscal quarters every year without exception.

SBC vs. Buybacks: Apple’s Capital Return Framework

Apple’s SBC program is completely overwhelmed by its buyback program:

  • Calendar 2025 SBC: ~$13.2 billion (shares issued to employees)
  • Calendar 2025 buybacks: ~$95+ billion (shares repurchased from market)
  • Net effect: Apple’s diluted share count declined by approximately 3–4% in 2025

At this scale, Apple’s SBC is effectively cost-neutral for existing shareholders — the dilution from new shares issued to employees is more than offset every quarter by buybacks. See Apple Free Cash Flow History to understand how Apple funds this capital return program. Apple generated approximately $123 billion in free cash flow in calendar 2025, providing ample capacity for both the $13 billion SBC offset and the broader buyback program.

GAAP vs. Non-GAAP: The SBC Bridge

Apple does not formally report non-GAAP earnings in its press releases (unlike Microsoft, Nvidia, and most other large-cap tech companies). Apple’s reported earnings are GAAP-inclusive of SBC. Analysts covering Apple typically calculate their own non-GAAP estimates by adding back SBC, giving:

  • Q4 2025 GAAP EPS: $2.84
  • Q4 2025 estimated non-GAAP EPS: approximately $3.08 (adding back ~$0.24 SBC impact after tax)

The GAAP/non-GAAP gap for Apple is narrower than for most tech peers (roughly 7–8%) precisely because Apple’s SBC ratio is low. See Apple EPS History for the full GAAP diluted EPS trajectory.

Key Takeaways

  • Apple SBC grew from ~$1.2B/quarter (2017) to $3.6B/quarter (2025 Q4) — roughly 3x in absolute terms
  • As a percentage of revenue, SBC has held at 2.1–3.0% for eight consecutive years — best-in-class ratio for large-cap tech
  • The absolute dollar growth reflects stock price appreciation on grant-date valuations, not excessive headcount equity grants
  • At $95+ billion in annual buybacks vs. $13 billion in SBC, net dilution is deeply negative (shares count declines each year)
  • Apple does not report formal non-GAAP EPS; the GAAP/non-GAAP gap from SBC is approximately 7–8%